電波×落書き
twitter @grafi_tt
hatenaID grafi
twitter @grafi_tt
hatenaID grafi
May 19, 2012
May 19, 2012
May 10, 2012
"113 名前:テープ(京都府)[sage]:2010/03/13(土) 23:47:32.55 ID:frbJTCLj
なぁ、マンコでアルコール摂取できるなら
普通にご飯マンコに入れたらおなかいっぱいになるんじゃね?
"
普通にご飯マンコに入れたらおなかいっぱいになるんじゃね?
May 3, 2012
"
1キログラムの当初の定義は「水1リットルの質量」である。1795年の定義では、「大気圧下で氷の溶けつつある温度(すなわち0度)における水」となっていたが[1]、その後、水の体積は温度依存することが分かり、結果として定義は、「最大密度(=液温摂氏4度)における蒸留水1立方デシメートル(1リットル)の質量」と定義された。しかし、水の密度は気圧と温度に影響され、気圧にはその因子に質量が含まれている。すなわちこのキログラムの定義には循環依存が含まれていることになる。この問題を避けるため、1799年に、当時の技術で上記のキログラムの定義に合わせた白金製の原器が作製された。これをアルシーヴ原器(kilogramme des Archives)と呼ぶ。
"
May 3, 2012
May 1, 2012
"「性教育」から「生教育」へ、「予防教育」から「希望教育」へ"
April 30, 2012
April 29, 2012
"例えば、重要な汚染物質であるフェノールは、西洋ワサビペルオキシダーゼによって多量体化して除去することができる。フェノールがフェノキシラジカルへ酸化され、これが多量体化するのである。多量体化したフェノールは単量体よりも毒性が低い。"
April 10, 2012
April 6, 2012
"A note on terminology: The phrase “purely
functional programming language” is usually applied to
languages, like Haskell or
Clean, which are lazy and
demand explicit sequencing of side effects. I dislike this
terminology: for one thing, a “functional” programming
language is one in which functions have first-class citizenship, so a
“purely functional” one should be one where, as in
Unlambda, only functions have first-class citizenship. And
what are usually called “purely functional programming
languages” should be called, exactly as I just did, lazily
evaluating programming languages with explicitly sequenced side
effects. All these points are orthogonal: it is quite possible to
conceive a lazy programming language which is not functional, or an
eager (i.e. non-lazy) functional programming language which still
demands explicit sequencing of side effects. In any case, this is to
say that I might, on occasion, speak of Unlambda as a “purely
functional” programming language, although, with the usual
terminology, it is not."
functional programming language” is usually applied to
languages, like Haskell or
Clean, which are lazy and
demand explicit sequencing of side effects. I dislike this
terminology: for one thing, a “functional” programming
language is one in which functions have first-class citizenship, so a
“purely functional” one should be one where, as in
Unlambda, only functions have first-class citizenship. And
what are usually called “purely functional programming
languages” should be called, exactly as I just did, lazily
evaluating programming languages with explicitly sequenced side
effects. All these points are orthogonal: it is quite possible to
conceive a lazy programming language which is not functional, or an
eager (i.e. non-lazy) functional programming language which still
demands explicit sequencing of side effects. In any case, this is to
say that I might, on occasion, speak of Unlambda as a “purely
functional” programming language, although, with the usual
terminology, it is not."
RSS feed: http://tumblr.grafi.jp/rss
1 of 50
Next page
